The White House’s website states 25 executive orders have been signed since Donald Trump was inaugurated.

Within the first 24 hours of being sworn in as the President of the United States for the second time, Donald Trump has wasted no time signing off on multiple executive orders.

Halting the TikTok ban

The White House website states: “To fulfil those responsibilities, I intend to consult with my advisors, including the heads of relevant departments and agencies on the national security concerns posed by TikTok, and to pursue a resolution that protects national security while saving a platform used by 170 million Americans.

“My Administration must also review sensitive intelligence related to those concerns and evaluate the sufficiency of mitigation measures TikTok has taken to date.”

The ban has subsequently been paused ‘for a period of 75 days’ to allow Trump’s administration to ‘determine the appropriate course forward’.

Trump has paused the TikTok ban (Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Official policy that there are ‘only two genders’

The order’s title reads: “Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government.”

The policy recognizes ‘two sexes, male and female’ and states them as not being ‘changeable’ but ‘grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.

“Each agency and all Federal employees shall enforce laws governing sex-based rights, protections, opportunities, and accommodations to protect men and women as biologically distinct sexes.

“Agencies shall remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology, and shall cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications or other messages. Agency forms that require an individual’s sex shall list male or female, and shall not request gender identity. Agencies shall take all necessary steps, as permitted by law, to end the Federal funding of gender ideology.”

The order states the US will only recognize ‘male’ and ‘female’ (CHIP SOMODEVILLA/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

‘Restoring’ death penalty

The order accuses Biden’s government and judges who oppose capital punishment of ‘efforts to subvert and undermine capital punishment defy the laws of [the] nation, make a mockery of justice, and insult the victims of these horrible crimes’.

Trump’s order states: “The Government’s most solemn responsibility is to protect its citizens from abhorrent acts, and my Administration will not tolerate efforts to stymie and eviscerate the laws that authorize capital punishment against those who commit horrible acts of violence against American citizens.”

The policy adds: “It is the policy of the United States to ensure that the laws that authorize capital punishment are respected and faithfully implemented, and to counteract the politicians and judges who subvert the law by obstructing and preventing the execution of capital sentences.”

Trump’s order seeks to ‘restore’ the death penalty (Jeremy Hogan/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

‘Ending radical and wasteful government diversity, equity and inclusion’ programs

The order states: “The Biden Administration forced illegal and immoral discrimination programs, going by the name ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI), into virtually all aspects of the Federal Government, in areas ranging from airline safety to the military.

“[…] Pursuant to Executive Order 13985 and follow-on orders, nearly every Federal agency and entity submitted ‘Equity Action Plans’ to detail the ways that they have furthered DEIs infiltration of the Federal Government. The public release of these plans demonstrated immense public waste and shameful discrimination. That ends today.

“Americans deserve a government committed to serving every person with equal dignity and respect, and to expending precious taxpayer resources only on making America great.”

Trump’s administration also plans to scrap ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ programs (KEVIN LAMARQUE/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Reversing 78 of Biden’s ‘harmful’ executive actions

The executive order accuses the previous administration of embedding ‘deeply unpopular, inflationary, illegal and radical practices within every agency and office of the Federal Government’.

It continues: “The injection of ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI) into our institutions has corrupted them by replacing hard work, merit, and equality with a divisive and dangerous preferential hierarchy.

“Orders to open the borders have endangered the American people and dissolved Federal, State, and local resources that should be used to benefit the American people.

“Climate extremism has exploded inflation and overburdened businesses with regulation.”

The order accuses Biden’s administration of ‘radical practices’ (Mandel Ngan – Pool/Getty Images)

Pardoning Capitol Rioters

Under the section titled ‘Ending the Weaponization of the federal government,’ the White House’s page states: “The Department of Justice even jailed an individual for posting a political meme. And while the Department of Justice has ruthlessly prosecuted more than 1,500 individuals associated with January 6, and simultaneously dropped nearly all cases against BLM rioters. “

Trump accuses the past administration of ‘inflicting political pain’ rather than ‘pursuing actual justice or legitimate government objectives’ against Americans who ‘spoke out against previous administration’s actions and other Americans who were simply exercising constitutionally protected rights’.

The order links to a presidential action pardoning multiple individuals ‘convicted of offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, to time served as of January 20, 2025’ alongside granting ‘a full, complete or unconditional pardon to all other individuals convicted of offenses related to events’ on the same day too.

The White House’s website states: “This proclamation ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation.”

Free speech and federal censorship

The White House’s website states: “Enshrines the right of the American people to speak freely in the public square without Government interference.

“Over the last four years, the previous administration trampled free speech rights by censoring Americans’ speech on online platforms, often by exerting substantial coercive pressure on third parties, such as social media companies, to moderate, deplatform, or otherwise suppress speech that the Federal Government did not approve. Under the guise of combatting ‘misinformation,’ ‘disinformation,’ and ‘malinformation,’ the Federal Government infringed on the constitutionally protected speech rights of American citizens across the United States in a manner that advanced the Government’s preferred narrative about significant matters of public debate.

:Government censorship of speech is intolerable in a free society.”

The White House website says the first amendment ‘enshrines the right of the American people to speak freely in the public square without Government interference’ (John Keeble/Getty Images)

Blocking refugees

The order suspends the US Refugee Admissions Program ‘until such time as the further entry into the United States of refugees aligns with the interests of the United States’.

“The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit aliens to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the entry of such aliens as refugees is in the national interest and does not pose a threat to the security or welfare of the United States.” it says.

Limiting birthright citizenship

If a ‘person’s mother was unlawfully present in the US and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth’ or ‘when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States at the time of said person’s birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa) and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth’ then the person is not ‘automatically’ given the ‘priceless and profound gift’ of ‘the United States citizenship‘.

The order is suspending the US Refugee Admissions Program (Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing via Getty Images)

‘Securing’ borders

The order states: “Over the last four years, the United States has endured a large-scale invasion at an unprecedented level. Millions of illegal aliens from nations and regions all around the world successfully entered the United States where they are now residing, including potential terrorists, foreign spies, members of cartels, gangs, and violent transnational criminal organizations, and other hostile actors with malicious intent.”

The order calls upon the Federal Government to ‘act with urgency and strength’ to secure the border and ‘protect the American people from the disastrous effects of unlawful mass migration and resettlement’ including constructing ‘temporary and permanent physical barriers’ and deploying personnel.

‘Protecting American people against invasion’

The order accuses Biden’s administration of letting ‘millions of illegal aliens’ cross the borders.

“Many of these aliens unlawfully within the United States present significant threats to national security and public safety, committing vile and heinous acts against innocent Americans. Others are engaged in hostile activities, including espionage, economic espionage, and preparations for terror-related activities.” it says.

“Many have abused the generosity of the American people, and their presence in the United States has cost taxpayers billions of dollars at the Federal, State, and local levels.

“Enforcing our Nation’s immigration laws is critically important to the national security and public safety of the United States. The American people deserve a Federal Government that puts their interests first and a Government that understands its sacred obligation to prioritize the safety, security, and financial and economic well-being of Americans.”

The order calls for the Federal government to ‘act with urgency and strength’ when it comes to securing borders (John Moore/Getty Images)

‘Protecting the US from foreign terrorists’

The order seeks to tighten the ‘visa-issuance process’ to ‘ensure that those aliens approved for admission into the US do not intend to harm Americans’ or the ‘national interests’.

“More importantly, the United States must identify them before their admission or entry into the United States.”

‘Protecting the territorial integrity’ of the US

The order states plans to ‘seal the borders and maintain the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and security of the United States by repelling forms of invasion including unlawful mass migration, narcotics trafficking, human smuggling and trafficking, and other criminal activities’.

Cartels named as ‘foreign terrorist organizations’

The order states: “It is the policy of the United States to ensure the total elimination of these organizations’ presence in the United States and their ability to threaten the territory, safety, and security of the United States through their extraterritorial command-and-control structures, thereby protecting the American people and the territorial integrity of the United States.”

United States foreign aid

US foreign development assistance will be paused for 90 days and no assistance will be given until ascertained that its ‘fully aligned with the foreign policy of the President of the US’ and is ‘aligned with American interests and in many cases antithetical to American values’.

Trump’s administration plans to name drug cartels as ‘foreign terrorist organizations’ (CHIP SOMODEVILLA/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

‘America first policy’

The order’s purpose and policy states: “From this day forward, the foreign policy of the United States shall champion core American interests and always put America and American citizens first.

“As soon as practicable, the Secretary of State shall issue guidance bringing the Department of State’s policies, programs, personnel, and operations in line with an America First foreign policy, which puts America and its interests first.”

‘Restoring accountability to policy-influencing positions’ in federal workforce

The White House’s website states: “Article II of the United States Constitution vests the President with the sole and exclusive authority over the executive branch, including the authority to manage the Federal workforce to ensure effective execution of Federal law.

“A critical aspect of this executive function is the responsibility to maintain professionalism and accountability within the civil service.

“This accountability is sorely lacking today. “

Punishing ‘election interference’

The order accuses ’51 former intelligence officials’ of coordinating with ‘the Biden campaign’ to ‘issue a letter discrediting the reporting that President Joseph R. Biden’s son had abandoned his laptop at a computer repair business’.

It then lists a number of individuals, revoking ‘any current or active clearances’ and reinforced anyone who holds ‘government-issued security clearances should not use their clearance status to influence US elections’.

One order accuses ’51 former intelligence officials’ of coordinating with the ‘Biden campaign’ (MELINA MARA/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

US leaving the World Health Organization (WHO)

The order accuses who of ‘mishandling’ the COVID-19 pandemic alongside ‘other global health crises’.

The executive order continues: “The WHO continues to demand unfairly onerous payments from the United States, far out of proportion with other countries’ assessed payments.

“China, with a population of 1.4 billion, has 300 percent of the population of the United States, yet contributes nearly 90 percent less to the WHO.”

Withdrawing US from Paris climate agreement

The executive order argues the US has ended up involved in ‘international agreements and initiatives that do not reflect [the] country’s values or [its] contributions to the pursuit of economic and environmental objectives’.

“Moreover, these agreements steer American taxpayer dollars to countries that do not require, or merit, financial assistance in the interests of the American people,” it states.

Subsequently, it states its intentions for The United States Ambassador to the United Nations [to] immediately submit formal written notification of the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’.

Trump accused WHO of ‘mishandling’ Covid-19 (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

National energy emergency

The order accuses the ‘previous administration’ of having ‘driven [the] Nation into a national emergency, where a precariously inadequate and intermittent energy supply, and an increasingly unreliable grid,’ the US now ‘requi[ring] swift and decisive action’.

Assessments will look at transportation and infrastructure alongside endangered species and the nation’s energy supply and clean water act.

‘Unleashing American energy’

The order accuses ‘burdensome and ideologically motivated regulations’ of ‘imped[ing] the development of’ America’s ‘abundance of energy and natural resources’ and limiting ‘the generation of reliable and affordable electricity, reduced job creation, and inflicted high energy costs upon our citizens’.

“These high energy costs devastate American consumers by driving up the cost of transportation, heating, utilities, farming, and manufacturing, while weakening our national security,” it adds.

One order is about ‘restoring’ American ‘greatness’ (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

‘Department of Government Efficiency’

“This Executive Order establishes the Department of Government Efficiency to implement the President’s DOGE Agenda, by modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity.”

‘Unleashing’ Alaska’s natural resources

The order plans to use Alaska’s ‘vast lands and resources’ for the benefit of the US, tapping into its ‘abundant’ supply of ‘energy, mineral, timber, and seafood’ to ‘raise the prosperity of our citizens while helping to enhance [the] Nation’s economic and national security for generations to come’ by creating ‘high-quality jobs’ and delivering ‘price relief’.

‘Restoring names that honor American greatness’

For example, the ‘renaming of Mount McKinley’ and the Gulf of America. The order states: “It is in the national interest to promote the extraordinary heritage of our Nation and ensure future generations of American citizens celebrate the legacy of our American heroes.

“The naming of our national treasures, including breathtaking natural wonders and historic works of art, should honor the contributions of visionary and patriotic Americans in our Nation’s rich past.”

Variety reporter Marc Malkin has faced criticism online for his Golden Globes interview with Ariana Grande.

The 82nd Golden Globes Awards took place last night (January 5) at the Beverly Hilton Hotel in Los Angeles.

The awards ceremony saw the first ever woman to host the Golden Globes solo, with comedian Nikki Glaser taking to the stage.

However, before the ceremony really kicked off in full swing, one red carpet interviewer piqued the attention of social media users after a rather ‘uncomfortable’ interaction with Wicked star Ariana Grande.

Grande was nominated for her role as Glinda in the 2024 musical fantasy movie and took to the red carpet wearing a pale yellow gown with a beaded bodice, from the Haute Couture S/S 1966 collection by Hubert de Givenchy and was purchased from Rita Watnick-owned LILY et Cie, People reports.

In her red carpet interview with Variety’s senior culture and events editor, Marc Malkin, Grande revealed the dress was inspired by the yellow brick road in the movie and the color being ‘one of Glinda’s favorite colors’.

After discussing the musician’s outfit, Malkin moved on to asking about her preparations for the ceremony and what song Grande was listening to while getting ready.

Ariana Grande was asked to sing by red carpet interviewer Marc Malkin (Getty Images/ Taylor Hill/FilmMagic)

The star noted they ‘were all just giggling and talking,’ but Malkin pushes on, asking her if there’s one song to sum up the day, adding: “I want you to sing for me a little bit.”

He continues: “I want a little song. I’ll sing with you.”

When Grande asks what the host wants to sing, he begins Carole King’s ‘You’ve Got A Friend,’ despite Grande beginning to sing ‘One Short Day’ from Wicked.

“Okay, you’re there. I’m still in Oz,” the actor notes, before graciously applauding Malkin for his brief rendition of several words of the Carole King song.

However, the moment hasn’t gone unnoticed by social media users who’ve flocked online to weigh in on Malkin’s approach to the interview.

Variety

@Variety

·Follow

Variety’s @marcmalkin sings for Ariana Grande. bit.ly/3DIr8jI

Watch on X

7:04 PM · Jan 5, 2025

595

Reply

Copy link

Read 4 replies

One Twitter user said: “Marc Malkin is so cringe. Stop making everyone uncomfortable by making them sing.”

“Marc malkin stop asking people to sing on the red carpet interview,” another added, while a third wrote: “marc malkin’s so bad at this dude, i really feel like he’s on the same level as those tiktok influencer press junkets.”

Responding to a clip of Malkin going on to interview fellow Wicked star Cynthia Erivo, a fourth added: “The way he clearly doesn’t know the words (nor has he seen wicked).”

And a final resolved: “I’m sure he’s a very nice man and his dinner parties are exquisite but i’m beginning to think we should stop letting marc malkin on red carpets.”

Maybe he was just having an off day eh?

UNILAD has contacted Variety for comment.

If you watched one of the most recent episodes of Saturday Night Live you’ll know exactly what we’re on about.

Bowen Yang laid it on a bit thick with Ariana Grande while appearing as host on the popular show – which drew in one of the largest viewerships since Elon Musk and Miley Cyrus appeared on it back in 2021.

A staggering 5.6 million viewers watched it live when it aired last month and it involved a skit where Grande played a mom of a family, and her son, played by Michael Longfellow, invited his boyfriend Bowen Yang to family game night for the first time.

There was a lot of smack talk and viewers even witness Yang throw a body-double of Grande to the floor, but it all eventually ended with the pair kissing – though the comedian’s part in the lipsing was a bit ‘too much’ he conceded.

He has since apologized to Grande when she joined him on his Las Culturistas podcast which he co-hosts with Matt Rogers.

Ariana Grande as Diane and Bowen Yang as Josh during the ‘Game Night’ sketch (Will Heath/NBC via Getty Images)

Yang told Grande: “I really have to apologize to you in person.

“I opened up my mouth too much when we kissed on SNL.”

Grande’s response probably wasn’t what Yang wanted to hear as the singer replied: “You absolutely did.”

But she spared his blushes by adding: “I was shaking after. Not in a bad way. Just in a disarming way.”

She clarified that she actually thought that her role as ‘Diane’ actually needed it for the scene.

“It felt like what these people needed at that time. It felt like what these characters required. I’m all for it,” Grande added.

She then went on to explain in a little more detail how the kiss came to be, admitting she actually thought the scene needed the two to smooch to elevate it.

Grande and Yang explained they both thought of the idea that the pair should kiss for the scene (Will Heath/NBC via Getty Images)

Grande continued: “When we rehearsed it, [I had] a little thought in my head. I didn’t say anything because I was like, ‘Everyone’s going to think I’m absolutely insane and too comfortable’. But I [thought to myself]: ‘How funny would it be if we kissed at the end?'”

As it turned out Yang, who features in the upcoming Wicked movie alongside Grande who stars as Glinda the Good Witch, actually messaged the songstress about it prior to the skit taking place.

Grande reflected: “And then Bowen texts me a few hours later, [saying]: ‘It’s totally fine, if this is way too crazy, but we were talking and thought it would be so funny if we kissed at the end’.

“And I was like: ‘Wow, I was thinking that’.”

Ariana Grande has offered up an explanation to fans after footage of her speaking with Penn Badgley left viewers completely confused.

It sometimes can be jarring to hear singers speaking in their regular voices – Adele’s strong accent is one example that springs to mind – but it wasn’t an accent that had fans asking questions this time.

Instead, Grande left fans baffled after she appeared to ‘change’ her voice while speaking with the You star on an episode of his podcast, Podcrushed, about her career and her upcoming movie, Wicked.

Though we’re used to hearing Grande singing more than engaging in regular conversation, fans were still surprised when they heard her speaking in a deeper tone than they’re used to.

Things only got more strange when she suddenly switched to a higher-pitched voice, prompting a lot of viewers to share their confusion on social media.

Viewers were entirely baffled by the ‘voice change’. (X/Podcrushed/YouTube)

“This voice change is sending me [crying emojis] regular Ariana was coming out for a second,” one person wrote.

A clip of the interview, captioned ‘the voice change??’, ended up catching Grande’s attention after doing the rounds online, and with so many people asking the same question, the singer decided to offer up an explanation.

She responded to the video in a comment, explaining the change was conscious and purposeful.

Grande wrote: “[It’s a] habit (speaking like this for two years) and also [for] vocal health. I intentionally change my vocal placement (high/low) often depending on how much singing I’m doing.”

Pointing out it was nothing new, she added: “I’ve always done this BYE.”

Grande responded to the questions in a comment. (Instagram)

Grande revealed in the interview that she has been doing a lot of singing in recent weeks – despite only having released her last album in March.

“I went to the studio the day after the Met [Gala] and stayed for, like, 10 days and I was literally living there,” she told Badgley.

“I’ve been writing a lot, and maybe there’s more. I would like to do a deluxe at some point.”

A lot of Grande’s fans jumped to her defence after people questioned her voice change, with one person encouraging people to get over it.

Ariana Grande indicated she’d been singing a lot recently. (Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for The Met Museum/Vogue)

“This discourse y’all have about ariana’s voice every week is so tired like wdgaf we get she has 2 different voices move on [sic],” one wrote.

Another agreed, writing: “i genuinely refuse to believe that this many people are p**sed off by ariana’s speaking voice like GODDAMN is it that serious.”

Fans will soon get to hear a lot more of both speaking and singing from Grande as she’s set to appear in the role of Glinda in the movie version of the musical Wicked.